| Ray Artiano doesn't like to talk about why Robert Gallagher left the law firm that the two of them founded with Sidney Stutz in 1982. It seems clear to this author that Gallagher left because he couldn't stomach the obstruction of justice that was being practiced by the firm. If Ray Artiano wants to obtain a verdict on the facts in his defamation lawsuit against this website, he is going to have to talk about the complaint of obstruction of justice sent to the firm by this author in December 2003, just before Mr. Gallagher decided to move to Higgins, Fletcher and Mack. Of course, Mr. Artiano doesn't want a finding of facts. He wants the case remanded to state court, where he trusts that justice will be perverted, and he will be able to prevail simply because his law firm works for public entities, and the state courts tend to protect public entities. The California Court of Appeal is responsible for this situation, since it tends to overturn even the most justifiable jury verdicts without rhyme or reason. Given this situation, Superior Court judges such as the judge in my case know that even though Stutz' opponent has the truth and the law on her side, she will most likely bankrupt herself fighting the case, without a chance of obtaining justice in the end. After Gallagher left, the firm proclaimed on its website, "Each of the founding members of the law firm practices with the firm today." In his deposition, Ray Artiano referred to Bob Gallagher as an "employee" who left the firm. |
| Stutz law firm's blatant and pathetic attempts to hide the truth behind Robert Gallagher's Decision to leave Stutz, Gallagher, Artinano, Shinoff & Holtz |
| Two days after I faxed the document above to Stutz law firm, the Stutz website was changed (see document below.) |
| The cover-up of the reasons behind Robert Gallagher's departure from Stutz, Gallagher, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz in early 2004 |
| SAN DIEGO EDUCATION REPORT |
mauralarkins.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| The Cover-up |
