PERB General Counsel Robert Thompson began working for PERB in
1980 as a Legal Adviser to then Chair Harry Gluck. He has also worked
as a Regional Attorney and was the Deputy General Counsel from 1988
until his appointment as General Counsel on December 7, 2001.

He received a Bachelor of Sciences degree in Chemical Engineering from
Northwestern University and is a member of the Executive Committee of
the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California.
PERB

APPENDIX IV-C
Elections Conducted: 2001 - 2002
Representation
LA-RR-01078-E
GUAJOME PARK ACADEMY
Wall
Certificated
No Representation
48
Public Employment Relations Board
Bob Thompson
SD Education Rprt Blog
SITE MAP
Home

Why This Website

SDCOE

CVESD

Castle Park Elem

Law Enforcement

CTA

CVE

Stutz Artiano Shinoff

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
Public Employee
Relations Board

PERB

PERB cases 2008

Did CVESD Violate EERA?
PERB's Robert Thompson worked with CTA's Beverly Tucker on the
Turlock case.
San Diego
Education Report
The Turlock case

The Turlock case was about
CTA members wearing buttons
in the classroom to campaign
against the efforts of teachers
to have another union replace
CTA
in the Turlock School District.

The administrative law judge at the
Public Employees Relations Board
(PERB) ruled against the teachers.
The judge's decision was clearly
correct, since the California Court
of Appeal had decided the
question of campaign buttons in
the classroom in a case from San
Diego. But the PERB board
overruled its own judge. When
Turlock School District appealed,
Bob Thompson, general counsel at
PERB joined with CTA head lawyer
Beverly Tucker to fight the appeal.
They lost.

But Bob Thompson and Beverly
Tucker did prove that they care
more about the power of those
who control CTA than they care
about the taxpayers or children
of California.
How did they prove
this? They used tax dollars to fight
this self-serving lawsuit during the
2003 budget crisis in California.

Bev and Bob lost; the
decision is
HERE. So what did they do then?
They appealed to the state
supreme court and lost again.
These are truly vexatious litigants.]