What happens to whistle-blowers?  To
high performers?
Link: Grossmont
Community College
President Dr. Ted
Martinez, Jr.
San Diego Reader
Home

Why This Website

SDCOE

CVESD

Castle Park Elem

Law Enforcement

CTA

CVE

Stutz Artiano Shinoff

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
San Diego Education
Report Blog
Site Map
Commentary on the Firing of Ted Martinez
La Prensa
January 6, 2006
By Beth Smith

... Martinez is a strong advocate for Grossmont College – always
has been and probably always will be.
He continued to
choose championing for the students, programs and
community that is Grossmont College, and unfortunately,
this stance led to a conflict between him and Suarez.

He did exactly what every college president is expected to do –
bring to the attention of the district administration and board the
problems and inequities facing Grossmont College with the
intent to resolve the issues as soon as possible. However
, it
appears that Suarez did not want him to do the job he was
hired to do...

This relationship became especially strained in early 2004.

The first, a seemingly minor accounting error, identified district
expenses that were being charged to the college... The dollar
amount varied between $200,000 to $300,000 per year, a
sizeable amount that could have been redirected to hiring much
needed faculty and staff.
Suarez made no attempt to absorb
the charges back into the district budget, offered no
explanation for why the charges were there, and
disgustingly, offered no apology to the college for years
of “stealing” funds away from educational programs...

The second issue is much more problematic... It is the allocation
and spending of the capital construction bond revenue, locally
known as Prop R, approximately $207 million dollars. East
County voters passed the bond that was advertised as “R for
repair,” citing the aging Grossmont campus and the need for
some new construction within the district. When the district
announced the split of the funds...Not only did the split
emphasize new construction at the other campus in the district,
but it nearly eliminated all repair funds from the budget for the
college. Martinez again went to bat for the college requesting
more of the split and a greater portion to repair the 40+ year old
campus. All his requests were denied and the college has been
suffering the results of the split since...

The Grossmont Faculty challenged the processes used by the
district to determine the Prop R split. The chancellor ... violated
the faculty’s legal right to participate in the development of
budget and planning processes...The Academic Senate voted
no confidence in Suarez in March 2005...

The board response to the vote of no confidence in Suarez was
predictable, but the vitriol was not. With comments like “Bring it
on” and a patronizing “You’re not happy?” litany, the board
supported Suarez, mocked the faculty concerns, and left
Martinez in the middle... Martinez stressed problem solving while
Suarez sought to gain power. Martinez was left in a pickle.

In June, the board voted to extend the contracts, out of the normal evaluation cycle, to the chancellor,
vice chancel...Not Martinez.

...Not once did the board acknowledge the comments of the speakers or the work of Martinez, but
instead the board showed a disappointing display of irreverence and disrespect for the speakers and
Martinez.

... on December 23, 2005, two days before Christmas, and an official day of closure for the college.
The board called a special closed meeting at 4:00 scheduled for that day. The agenda looked innocent
enough, but the campus soon learned that the board would take action against Martinez. Education
Code clearly states the processes and timelines for dealing with contracts of administrators, and the
board “just recently learned” that it had to take action six months prior to the end of Martinez’ contract
in June 2006. In a closed session, the board voted unanimously to terminate his contract and not
renew it...

On the other hand, the Cuyamaca College president has faced questions by this newspaper about the
integrity of its noncredit program where Alzheimer’s patients are enrolled as students in college
courses; operates a college that has been in the “red” for 27 years and the subsidy required to sustain
the college increases each year; and credit enrollment there has been declining.

Did the board fire the right president?...

Beth Smith is Academic Senate President. Grossmont College.
Whistleblowing: A Study of
Managerial Differences

John P. Keenan and Associates
International, 2 Hillsboro Drive, ...
help curb fraudulent practices,
and in so doing avoid costly
lawsuits and negative publicity ....
Reprisal involves taking an
undesirable action against an
employee or ...
by JP Keenan - 2002 -



·  Culture and Whistleblowing An
Empirical Study of Croatian and ..
.

Keenan and Associates International,
a firm presenting ..... Against harm to
others .... with potential costly lawsuits,
and negative publicity. ...
by AA Tavakoli - 2003