Annie Dookhan, former state chemist who mishandled drug
evidence, sentenced to 3 to 5 years in prison
Disgraced state chemist Annie Dookhan is escorted bv court officers into the
prisoner’s dock at Suffolk Superior Court to begin serving her three to five year
state prison sentence.
By Milton J. Valencia, John R. Ellement and Martin Finucane
Boston Globe
November 22, 2013

Annie Dookhan, the former state chemist whose mishandling of evidence in
drug cases threw the state’s criminal justice system into turmoil, pleaded guilty
today in Suffolk Superior Court and was sentenced to three to five years in

“You plead guilty here because you are guilty?” Judge Carol S. Ball said as she
explained the rights Dookhan was giving up because of her guilty plea.

“Yes, Your Honor,” Dookhan said meekly.

Dookhan’s falsification of drug tests, in an attempt to look like a highly
productive employee, prompted the release of hundreds of convicts, raised
questions about thousands of cases, and forced the state to spend millions to
address the problems

Ball, who found that Dookhan had entered her plea “freely, willingly, and
voluntarily,” also sentenced Dookhan to two years of probation.

Dookhan, in handcuffs, spoke briefly with her lawyer before she was escorted
out of the courtroom.

During the hearing, she looked straight at a prosecutor, showing no emotion,
as the prosecutor went over the facts of the case and described the impacts of
her actions.

Prosecutors had requested a five-to-seven-year sentence for Dookhan. Her
defense attorney had argued for a maximum sentence of one year.

Sentencing guidelines called for a maximum sentence of three years for
Dookhan, but Ball said in a ruling last month she wanted to impose a tougher
sentence “given the magnitude of the harm she has done, considerations of
general deterrence and, particularly, punishment.”

The judge said in the ruling that “the consequences of her behavior, which she
ought to have foreseen, have been nothing short of catastrophic: Innocent
persons were incarcerated, guilty persons have been released to further
endanger the public, millions and millions of public dollars are being expended
to deal with the chaos Ms. Dookhan created, and the integrity of the criminal
justice system has been shaken to the core.”

According to the Patrick administration, government agencies dealing with the
fallout from the drug scandal have spent $8.5 million this year. The Legislature
has set aside an additional $8.6 million for Dookhan-related expenses.

Anthony Benedetti, chief counsel of the state public defender agency, said that
the issue of the drug lab scandal is an ongoing concern that cannot be ignored.

“Sadly, the saga continues for the thousands of individuals who have borne the
impact of Dookhan’s misdeeds, and the lab’s scandalous management,’’ said
Benedetti, who heads the Committee for Public Counsel Services.

He added, “The longer this continues, the more damage is done to our justice
system’s credibility. The science and evidence relied upon in criminal cases
must be unimpeachable.’’

Benedetti and Martin W. Healy, general counsel for the Massachusetts Bar
Association, both said they were anxious to see what conclusions Inspector
General Glenn Cunha, who is conducting a far-reaching investigation into the
drug lab, reaches about the integrity of the system.

“This is one chapter in a continuing saga,’’ Healy said of Dookhan’s plea and
prison sentence. “The legal community and the general public still have a
number of unanswered questions about what’s gone on here. How deep was
the problem? Is it really just isolated to Dookhan or does it go beyond that?’’

Dookhan pleaded guilty to 27 charges, including evidence tampering and
obstruction of justice. She worked at a now-closed Department of Public Health
lab in Jamaica Plain.

A scientific determination that a substance seized by police is an illegal drug is
a cornerstone of a drug case in court. A defendant cannot be convicted for
possession or distribution of, for example, a harmless white powder.

State officials have said Dookhan’s actions may have tainted more than 40,000

According to the state court officials, 950 people have been given a total of
2,922 special Superior Court hearings in eight counties – from Worcester east
— since the fall of 2012 when the scale of the Dookhan scandal began to be
recognized by prosecutors, defense attorneys, and defendants.

Since last year, the state Department of Correction has released more than
300 people convicted in drug cases where Dookhan played a role. That
number does not include anyone released by a county house of correction, the
Globe reported last month.

Court records showed that more than 600 people have had convictions against
them erased or temporarily set aside or have been released on bail pending
new trials because of Dookhan’s involvement in their cases, the Globe also

One defendant who was freed, Donta Hood of Brockton, is accused of
shooting and killing a man in May.
San Diego Education Report
San Diego
Education Report
San Diego Education
Report Blog
Why This Website

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation



Castle Park
Elementary School

Law Enforcement



Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
Faking the evidence to get ahead in a career
High performers and
Corruption in schools

Corruption in courts

Public Entity Attorneys
Incompetence or
Incompetence: Thank Heaven
Blog posts: law
enforcement problems
Faking achievements
Lying and Truth
Girl culture among teachers
Team dysfunction (SDER II site)
Motivated reasoning
Emotional maturity
Delusions of "normal" people
No good deed goes unpunished
Mental health
Ethics in education
Ethics in law
Cal Western ethics
Faking achievements
Justice, fairness