Lawsuit for defamation--Oct. 5, 2007
Recent blog posts about
this case
Maura Larkins removed
the case to Federal Court
(see docket)
Stutz Documents in
Larkins' Case
More on Daniel Shinoff
August 2007
threatening letter
from Stutz
They are clearly covering up something.  They need to
show what it is that they are covering up.
Page 6, lines 7-9
Paragraph 22
"Public officials who want to keep the public in the dark call
on Dan Shinoff and Mark Bresee to keep witneses quiet and
to finesse the paperwork."
Paragraph 23
"...violated the law in case after case."
I know this is true for the following cases:

GIC 781970

Helped cover up wrongdoing in
GIC 823858 (Elizabeth Schulman, Matthew C. Smith)

GIC 825879, later combined with GIC 781970, had five
causes of action, including fraud and obstruction of justice.
Ray Artiano illegally evaded service in this case.
Paragraph 24

Page 6 lines 23-26
"Daniel Shinoff, Kelly Angell Minnehan, Jeffery Morris and
their law firm, Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz took
$100,000s of taxpayer dollars to cover up crimes at Chula
Vista Elementary School District."
Maura Larkins' earlier lawsuit against
Stutz' clients was thrown out in
December 2004 because Larkins
failed to file a motion to compel.  
When her suit was thrown out, Larkins
was ordered to pay $3,124.68 in
COURT COSTS TO STUTZ
ALTHOUGH  THERE WAS NO
FINDING OF FACT.
Tactics for which Lozano, Smith
was sanctioned included
"repeated misstatements of the
record, frivolous objections to
plaintiff's statement of facts, and
repeated mischaracterizations
of the law.
I witnessed the proof that "a
culture of misrepresentation
and deception exists at
Stutz Artiano Shinoff."

I made this statement
because the public has a
right to know when its
officials are paying tax
dollars to lawyers for
violating the law.
Kelly Angell Compex fraud
August 2003
paragraph 15
Lozano Smith
Paragraph 25
Bob Gallagher

It was
approximately
March of 2004
when Maura
Larkins became
aware that
Gallagher had left
Stutz Gallagher.
Kelly Angell
informed Judge
Nevitt (in Larkins'
presence)  that
Gallagher was no
longer part of the
firm, and the firm
had changed its
name.
Citizen Media Law
Project (Harvard
University) regarding
this case
SD Education Rprt Blog
SITE MAP
First Amended Compalint  
Aug. 29, 2008
1.  Click HERE to see First Amended Complaint--Aug. 29, 2008
Ray Artiano deposition
Holtz) Nov. 8, 2009.
Main page with links to
documents in this case
Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz v. Maura Larkins
Motion to compel deposition
of Daniel Shinoff
San Diego Education
Report Blog
SITE MAP
Why This Website

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz v. Maura
Larkins defamation

SDCOE

CVESD

Castle Park
Elementary School

Law Enforcement

CTA

CVE

Stutz Artiano Shinoff
& Holtz

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
HOME
University of San Diego (USD) law professor Shaun Martin represented Maura
Larkins pro bono in the Court of Appeal.  He is the author of the blog California
Appellate Report.
August 5, 2011
California Court of Appeal decision in Stutz Artiano
Shinoff & Holtz v. Maura Larkins: injunction is overturned
Story in Voice of San Diego
Stutz attorney Daniel Shinoff is the favorite attorney of San Diego County Office
of Education.  University of San Diego (USD) law professor Shaun Martin
San Diego
Education Report
See decision