CALA Achievements  
Jan 4 08 downloaded

http://www.sdcala.org/gpage7.
html
·       A major force at the
grassroots level behind the
passage of Prop 64, “Stop
Shakedown Lawsuits” Initiative,  
which passed 59% - 41%.



·       Major proponent of the
Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act.



·       Major proponent of the
Class Action Fairness Act.



·       Successfully defeated
attacks on MICRA medical
liability caps.



·       Sponsored the Legal
Consumers Protection Act.



·       Successfully defeated
attacks on confidential
settlements.



·      Launched the “Lawsuits are
Making Us Sick” and “Take Out
the Trash” campaigns to draw
attention to how lawsuit abuse
increases medical costs, and
how “junk science” in the
courtroom thwarts justice.



·      Information from CALA
supporters led to the first known
criminal and/or disciplinary
investigations into the mass
filings of ADA/access lawsuits.



·       Generated hundreds of
opposition letters from CALA
supporters to SB 832 that would
have sent 75% of all punitive
damage awards to the State of
California, and AB 1489 which
would have expanded attorney
fees related to the AG’s office.  
The Governor vetoed both
measures.



·       Helped garner national
media attention on California’s
lawsuit crisis on CNBC’s Business
Nation, Penn & Teller, PBS,
Fortune Small Business
Magazine, Worth Magazine,
Kiplingers, as well as countless
local news features and editorial.



·       Polls consistently show
CALA’s credibility ranking in the
top two or three organizations,
along with MADD.    



·       Recognized by President
both George Bush and Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger; praised
by countless legislators and
judges.
Member, Republican
Party County Central
Committee;
County of
San Diego; Assembly
District 76 (6 Elected)

Tricia Hunter, Republican  
11312 votes 12.84%

Lorie Zapf,
Republican
8865 votes
10.07%

Sean Hoffman,
Republican .......... 7743
votes 8.79%
David A. King, Republican
.......... 7516 votes 8.53%
Marc P. Schaefer,
Republican .......... 7035
votes 7.99%
John "Woody" Woodrum,
Republican .......... 6872
votes 7.80%
http://www.smartvoter
.org/2006/06/06/ca/s
d/party_committee.html
CALA
"Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse"

or as I think of it...
"Common people Aren't Likely to have any Assets...
so why should CALA lawyers represent them when they are damaged?"

SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL

Posted date: 8/13/2007

San Diego City Taxpayers on
the Hook for $27M in ’05, ’06 for
Cost of Lawsuits

County Bar Asks Members to
Support Pledge for Diversity
By MICHELLE MOWAD

San Diego Business Journal
Staff

San Diego taxpayers spent $27
million on legal settlements,
awards and outside counsel in
2005 and 2006, according to a
report issued by California
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse.

CALA, a nonprofit watchdog
over the courts, found that
litigation against the city cost
taxpayers $11 million in
verdicts and settlements in
2005 and another $3.7 million in
outside counsel fees. In 2006,
verdicts and settlements
reached nearly $5 million and
outside counsel cost another
$2.7 million.

In 2005, litigation against the
county cost $3.8 million for
verdicts and settlements and
for outside counsel. In 2006,
verdicts and settlements cost
taxpayers $1.1 million and
outside counsel $400,000.

Lorie Zapf, president of CALA’s
San Diego chapter, said local
government is often the
subject of frivolous or abusive
lawsuits.

“As a result, it is the taxpayers
who pay and the community
who suffers,” said Zapf.

other critical services.
other critical services.


“San Diegans don’t pay taxes
with the understanding that
these monies will be used to
defend against unwarranted or
unscrupulous lawsuits,” she
said. “Our legal system should
not be a tool for those who
would seek to abuse it for
undeserved gain.”

CALA made inquiries to Los
Angeles, Orange and
Sacramento counties and the
cities of Anaheim, Los Angeles
and Sacramento. Each was
asked for the amount the city
or county spent on verdicts,
settlements and outside
counsel for 2005 and 2006.
CALA also examined city and
county budget documents.

In 2006, CALA reported $97.7
million in litigation, awards and
outside counsel costs from
these four cities, including San
Diego, and another $79.2
million in 2005. In the four
cities, CALA found litigation,
awards and outside counsel
costs topped $49 million in 2005
and $47 million in 2006.

Zapf added that the totals do
not reflect all costs associated
with city and county legal
cases. The counsel costs
reported do not include the
time and money that staff
attorneys on the public payroll
of the cities and counties spend
fighting lawsuits.

“The San Diego numbers sound
too low to me,” admitted Zapf.

She said there are no doubt
legitimate claims against cities
and counties, but attempts to
request additional information
about the settlements and
awards were not answered by
the city. Zapf said she
requested information from the
city several weeks ago but has
not heard back from the risk
management department.

• • •


http://sdbj.
com/archive_article.asp?
aID=97692115.
7502078.1512849.268339
5.5180827.793&aID2=116364
Republican Party of
San Diego County

Latest News from
Republican
Headquarters

S.D. County Citizens
Against Lawsuit Abuse
Tel: (619) 295-6059
Fax: (619) 295-6710
1761 Hotel Circle South, Suite
120
San Diego, CA 92108
E-mail: sdcala@sbcglobal.net
Website: www.sdcala.org
March 19, 2007

COUNTY PARTY COMMITTEE
MEMBER TO BE PRESIDENT
OF CITIZENS AGAINST
LAWSUIT ABUSE
Central Committee Member
Lorie Zapf to Lead CALA

San Diego County Citizens
Against Lawsuit Abuse
Names Lorie Zapf as President

San Diego, CA (March 19,
2007) - San Diego County
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse
(CALA) has named Lorie Zapf
as its new president.

Zapf is a former small business
owner and has been an active
community volunteer for
several San Diego non-profit
organizations. Her background
includes positions in the news
media
as a radio and television news
reporter, public relations
manager, and a video producer.
“I’ve been a CALA supporter
since 1999 when the small
business my husband and I
owned was hit with a
“shakedown” lawsuit,” said Zapf.
“I am acutely aware of the toll a
lawsuit
takes on a business in terms of
lost productivity, legal
expenses, and the strain on
your family
and health. We were managing
our lawsuit, not growing our
business.”

San Diego is a city of thriving
small and entrepreneurial
businesses, but just one lawsuit
can bankrupt a small business
and put all their employees out
of work, Zapf warned.
“Lorie’s passion for fighting
lawsuit abuse will help CALA
advocate for the countless small
businesses and consumers
devastated by the effects of a
civil justice system out of
control—
whether through jobs lost as
businesses close, medical help
unavailable because of litigation
risk, or the escalating costs we
all pay because of those who
would game the system,” said
CALA Board Vice-Chairman
George Coles. “We look forward
to Lorie’s continued fight against
lawsuit abuse and to ensure our
legal system is used for justice,
not greed.”

“It is important that San Diego
area citizens understand the
role they have to play in
improving
the quality of our judicial
system,” said Zapf. “Serving on
a jury is one of the most
effective
tools we have to fight against
lawsuit abuse that costs us all.”

CALA is a nonprofit, grass
roots, public education
organization dedicated to
serving as a
watchdog over the legal system
and those who would seek to
abuse it for undeserved
gain. More than 9,500 citizens
and taxpayers are San Diego
CALA supporters.

# # #
Lori Zapf, President
of San Diego CALA

San Diego's Taxpayer Alert.org


CALA serves as a
watchdog over our
legal system and
those who would seek
to abuse it.

The San Diego chapter is one of
six independent CALA’s through
the state and is supported by
9,500 San Diego County
residents, taxpayers, and small
business owners.

Lorie is a former small business
owner and has been an active
community volunteer for several
San Diego non-profit
organizations. She has an
extensive background in the
news media industry.


http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:
mbiMRiSmn08J:taxpayeralert.org/%
3Fpage_id%
3D77+Lorie+Zapf+san+diego&
hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us
Republican Party of San
Diego County


November 26, 2007

ENVIRONMENT
PROTECTION GONE AWRY

so many other so many
other regulatory laws of
its type, a tool of
extortion for a long list of
special-interest groups
that have little – if any –
interest in the
environment. Because
CEQA focuses on land-use
issues, the sector most
often targeted with
lawsuit abuse disguised as
CEQA enforcement is the
building industry. And the
people who have set
builders in their cross-
hairs more than anyone
else are none other than
the labor union leaders
who cynically threaten to
rake over the
environmental regulatory
coals any project that
does not track with their
own narrow political
agenda.


Because CEQA is so broad-
ranging while offering
little specificity on just
how its review process
should be conducted,
complainants – in this
case, special-interest trial
attorneys – can, and
often do, exploit this legal
loophole to contest the
entire process no matter
what its findings, while
leveraging an insidious
tactic called “greenmail”
to force builders to either
acquiesce to their
demands or face the
exorbitant costs of not
only unnecessary delay,
but frivolous litigation.



And what are those
demands?

A perfect case in point
can be found right here in
San Diego County, where
local labor unions used
greenmail to secure a
union-only project labor
agreement on the
construction of Petco
Park. More recently, the
city of Chula Vista has
become embroiled in a
bitter battle between
union leaders and Gaylord
Entertainment, whose
billion-dollar hotel and
convention center
proposal for the Chula
Vista bayfront has been
under greenmail threat
ever since Gaylord
refused to sign a similar
union-only project labor
agreement. A union-
backed group calling itself
the Environmental Health
Coalition is pushing
Gaylord to use union-only
labor as a matter of
environmental
conservation. That a
project's union status has
absolutely nothing to do
with environmentalism is
an inconvenient truth that
even Al Gore would have
to accept, which is exactly
why the National Labor
Relations Board recently
voided a union project
labor agreement deemed
to have been signed
under similar duress in
New York. But the real
mystery is why any
rational environmentalist
would tolerate other
special-interest groups
hijacking his or her cause
for an immaterial political
agenda.





In the meantime,

however, greenmail
remains a special interest
ace-in-the-hole that has
proven highly effective in
achieving the most
environmentally
irrelevant objectives
through frivolous CEQA
lawsuits.

Take Wal-Mart, for
example, a favorite
target of litigious, anti-
growth special-interest
groups. In California
alone, a small team of
attorneys has been
wreaking litigation – and
thus economic havoc – by
suing more than 30 cities
that have approved Wal-
Mart Supercenters. All of
these suits have been
filed on environmental
grounds – many of them
CEQA-related. According
to The Associated Press,
“[many of] these suits
have been filed on behalf
of obscure, often
secretive community
groups that have few
known members. Some of
them have been backed
by labor unions leading an
anti-Wal-Mart fight in
California. . . .”

As with the abuse of
similarly well-intentioned
but fatally flawed
legislation, like the
Americans with
Disabilities Act, signed
into law by then-

President George H.W.
Bush in 1990, the
ramifications of frivolous
CEQA-based lawsuits can
be huge – not just for the
cities, which lose millions
of dollars in much-needed
revenue and
infrastructure expansion.
Or the environmental
movement, which loses
credibility. Or even the
workers, who lose vital
jobs. The hardest hit are
the everyday taxpayers –
the people who end up
losing a stronger
economy, a cleaner
environment, a more
efficient legal system,
and a better quality of
life. These are the
Californians who are tired
of paying the equivalent
of a 5 percent tax to
cover frivolous lawsuits
launched by trial
attorneys whose
combined earnings dwarf
those of Microsoft; or
sinking their hard-earned
tax dollars into a legal
system ranked the fifth-
worst in the United States.




Greenmail-type extortion
and CEQA abuse are a
threat both to the
preservation of our
environment and the rule
of law, compromising our
safety, security and
lifelong prosperity.
Californians must tighten
the environmental
regulatory process to end
this insidious form of
lawsuit abuse

Zapf is president of the
San Diego County Citizens
Against Lawsuit Abuse.
She can be reached via e-
mail at sdcala@sbcglobal.
net.  
GOP publishes stories by CALA:


County Party Committee
Member to be President of
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse


Central Committee Member
Lorie Zapf to Lead CALA

By Citizens Against Lawsuit
Abuse
March 19, 2007

... » Read More

http://www.sandiegorepublican
s.org/press/index.cfm/ID/109.htm
HEARING
OFFICER
MEETING
http://www.
sandiego.
gov/development
-
services/hearing
officer/minutes/2
004/homin04may
19.pdf
MINUTES OF MAY 19,
2004
ITEM-6: MISSION
VALLEY CHRISTIAN
FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
CUP–
PROJECT NO. 5087
Cathy Middlested –
Project Manager
Testimony in favor by:
Rhonda Fanucchi,
Lorie Zapf, Lance
Witmondt, Joseph
Holasek, Leticia Ruiz, R.
J.White, Michael
Sexton, Ken Kerr, Ted
Brengel, Jeb
Bakke, Don Daley,
Pastor Leo Giovinetti,
Matthew Landers,
Roxanne Confer,
Gloria Frennell, Sean
Fennell, Linda Kerr,
Bob Biron, Debbie
Gosch, Charmian
Turner, Jacqueline R
Scott, Wendy Scott,
Carlos Guerrero,
Monique Guerrero,
Martha Guerrero, Tony
Martin, Fredrick Studer,
Kathleen Studer, Vira
Joan
Wade, Maria Lilia
Langley, Billy Langley,
Rachel Grebbien, Steve
Van Camp,
Gail Van Camp, Julia
Smith, Mario, Fimbres,
Mandy Swonger, Shana
Fimbres,
Kathryn Cordova,
Wilfred Sturleon, Marlys
Snook, Don Lindsay,
Rick Hallahan,
Dennis Kris Martinez,
Deborah Sund, Frank
Leech, Gail Martin, Bob
Hillard,
Betty Breedlove,
Timothy Hathaway,
Jimmy Won. Belinda
Biron, Audrey Kay,
Henry Kay, G. Allen
Schlanbusch, John
Rodriguez, Michelle
Mitchell, Jon Lotta,
Cheryl Ann Walker,
Robert Cobb, Tony
Abat, Linda Reynolds,
Jim Hallahan,
Amy Meyer, Roberta
Clay, Linda Preatice,
Joe R. Ulibarri, Nancy
Valencia,
Richard Drew, Diana
Lee, Stephen R. Bailey,
Deborah S. Bailey,
Robyn Conners,
Sylvia Drew, Nancy
Athay, Marlena Jones,
Judy Ulibarri, Doris
Hargis, Carol
Holesaic, Steph
Amundson, Dennis
Brullow.
Testimony in opposition
by Patti Krebs, Dale
Watkins, Melanie
Colbert, Michael
Dunbar.
ACTION:
MOTION TO APPROVE
STAFF’S
RECOMMENDATIONS
WITH
ADDITIONAL AND
REVISED CONDITIONS
READ INTO THE
RECORD
BY STAFF AND THE
HEARING OFFICER.
RESOLUTION NUMBER
D-4688. REPORT NO.
HO 04-063.
Press Release from SD County  
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse
http://www.sdcala.org/gpage13.ht
ml

For Immediate Release - June 25,
2007
“Does Lawsuit
Abuse Adversely
Impact Your Family,
Consumers and/or
Your Community?”
North County Times
March 30, 2007
Disabled-access attorney slapped
with sanction

By: TERI FIGUEROA

The attorney who stirred
controversy when he threatened
to sue many Julian business
owners for allegedly violating
disability access laws has been
ordered by a federal judge to pay
more than $15,000 in fees and
take legal ethics training.

The order against Theodore
Pinnock, who has filed ---- and
settled out of court ---- hundreds
of access lawsuits against local
stores and businesses, came on
March 23, after he sued on behalf
of a woman who allegedly found
an Ocean Beach store
inaccessible.

But the store, Sea and Shore
Market, had been shuttered since
it flooded in December 2004.


The suit claims the woman visited
the shop in March 2006 and found
the front door to the store was too
heavy, the counters too high, the
walkways too narrow, and the
bathroom inaccessible.

The suit centered on alleged
violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act by Marcos Mouet
and his convenience store.

Pinnock filed the suit on behalf of
a group calling itself the
Association of Women with
Disabilities Advocating Access,
and a woman named Delores
Jackson, who uses a walker and
has difficulty seeing.

In the ruling, issued March 23,
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller
found that Pinnock's suit made
allegations "without reasoned and
competent inquiry."

Miller noted case law which finds
that imposition of sanctions is
reserved for the "rare and
exceptional case where the action
is clearly frivolous, legally
unreasonable or without legal
foundation."

Miller ordered Pinnock to take four
hours of legal ethics training
through the state bar, and also
told him to pay more than $15,000
in attorney fees for Mouet.

Mouet's attorney, Mitch Wallis, did
not return a call for comment
Friday.

Pinnock said in a telephone
interview Friday that he had erred
in this particular suit.

"We all make mistakes," he said.
"This mistake got blown out of
proportion."

Pinnock also sent an e-mail to the
North County Times, saying he
plans to continue filing access
suits.

"If people think that the Mouet
ruling will stop me, they are
mistaken," Pinnock wrote. "Being
born with severe cerebral palsy
did not stop me. Being born poor
and black did not stop me. Being
in an institution for ten years did
not stop me.

"Most in my position would have
stopped striving early in life. But
challenges invigorate my soul."

Pinnock, who uses a wheelchair,
became a controversial figure
after what he called the "Julian
Experiment" in 2005, in which he
slapped 67 business owners with
letters demanding that they come
into compliance with the
15-year-old Americans with
Disabilities Act and pay up to him
to the tune of about $2,500 per
business ---- or find themselves in
federal court.

Advocates for the disabled have
heralded Pinnock's work, noting
that the news of the suits was
getting press ---- which meant that
more business owners would tune
in to the needs of the disabled.

But Pinnock's negotiating tactics
angered business owners and
others, some of whom called his
access lawsuits "shakedowns."

In an e-mail statement sent to the
North County Times, the new
director of the San Diego chapter
of Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse
said her organization applauded
Miller's decision to sanction
Pinnock.

"Clearly, suing a business for
Americans with Disabilities Act
violations when the store wasn't
even open at the time is a blatant
example of lawsuit abuse,"
director Lorie Zapf wrote.

Contact staff writer Teri Figueroa
at (760) 631-6624 or
tfigueroa@nctimes.com.
Lawsuits
Shinoff
Lawsuits make
everyone safer
The laws protect us, but only if we can
enforce them in court
CVESD Report
CVESD Reporter
San Diego
Education Report Blog
California Teachers Blog
Role Model Lawyers
mauralarkin.com
Maura Larkin's
San Diego Education
Report Blog
SITE MAP
Nuevo blog en español
Blogs
Maura Larkins Case
List of School Districts
Lawyers
Public Entities & Press
Home

Why This Website

SDCOE

CVESD

Castle Park Elem

Law Enforcement

CTA

CVE

Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz

Silence is Golden

Schools and Violence

Office Admin Hearings

Larkins OAH Hearing
Education Reform
Report Website
EDUCATION AND
CULTURE WARS
P.S., a Minor, et al   v.
SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
When your kids are at school, they're on their own,
apparently..  School insurance won't compensate for families
like these who are harmed.
Blog Discussion
Court decision
Victory for CALA: June 2009 CA 4th
Appellate says school not liable when
substitute teacher molests student
Leslie Devaney, board member
San Diego CALA

Leslie Devaney radio schedule
from Stutz website
downloaded June 8, 2009

Gavel of Justice Show Features
Devaney, Sleeth and Dyer

July 06, 2005

Time Warner Cable and Cox
Cable are featuring Leslie
Devaney, Jack Sleeth and
Christina Dyer on the Gavel of
Justice Show. This is your
opportunity to see attorneys in
action as they share their views
on several hot topics.

Watch for these air dates:

TIME WARNER (Cable
19)Wednesday
Evenings 7:00 - 7:30 p.m.

June 29, 2005
TOPIC: How to Protect Yourself
from
an ADA Lawsuit
GUEST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano
Shinoff & Holtz and CALA Board
Member
HOST: Jim Edwards,Wireless
Facilities, Inc., and CALA Board
Member

July 6, 2005
TOPIC: The Employment Time
Bomb
GUEST: Jack M. Sleeth, Jr.,
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
HOST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member

July 13, 2005
TOPIC: Out of Control Issues in
the Education Field
GUEST: Christina Dyer, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
HOST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member

August 10, 2005 at 8:00 p.m.
TOPIC: How to Protect Yourself
from an ADA Lawsuit
GUEST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member
HOST: Jim Edwards, Wireless
Facilities, Inc. and CALA Board
Member

COX CABLE (Channel 23 or
18) Tuesday Evenings 8:00 -
8:30 p.m.

July 12, 2005
TOPIC: How to Protect Yourself
from an ADA Lawsuit
GUEST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member
HOST: Jim Edwards, Wireless
Facilities, Inc. and CALA Board
Member

July 19, 2005
TOPIC: The Employment Time
Bomb
GUEST: Jack M. Sleeth, Jr.,
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
HOST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member

July 26, 2005
TOPIC: Out of Control Issues in
the Education Field
GUEST: Christina Dyer, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
HOST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member

August 16, 2005
TOPIC: How to Protect Yourself
from an ADA Lawsuit
GUEST: Leslie Devaney, Stutz
Artiano Shinoff & Holtz and
CALA Board Member
HOST: Jim Edwards, Wireless
Facilities, Inc. and CALA Board
Member
Virginia Justice Brent Benjamin
CALA San Diego
Board of Directors
downloaded June 8, 2009

Leslie Devaney
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz


Carole M. Ross
Sheppard Mullin Richter &
Hampton

Jim Edwards
Wireless Facilities

Lloyd Rowland
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

David Geerdes
Procopio Cory Hargreaves &
Savitch

Pamela Anderson
Vineyard Bank

Steve Hales
California Financial Loan
Services

Steve Austin
Swenson Advisors      
(Advisory Board)

Stephen Friar
Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Keith E. Krzewski
Swenson Advisor

Dan Powell
CityPacific Corp.

George Coles
Coles Carpets

Don Reeves, AIA
Reeves and associates
From CALA website:


"San Diego Citizens Against Lawsuit
Abuse was founded in 1994 as a
non partisan, 501 (c) 6
non-profit educational
grassroots organization dedicated to
preventing improper use of the
legal system for personal
financial gain."

[Maura Larkins' note: Thank
goodness lawyers never use the
legal system improperly for
personal financial gain.  Only
injured parties do that.  But I
must say, your organization
looks quite partisan indeed.]
I'm a doctor. So sue me. No, really